Monday, 16 March 2015

Construction Marks for Assessment

Dear Moderator, 

Please find the final marks and comments for Construction.


Bryony & Morgan

Music Video Level 3 upper

There is a strong sense of control in the use of camera, with a variety of shot types used and framing predominantly well composed and purposeful. There is some experimentation with underwater GoPro perspectives and slow motion. Some creative experimentation with the use of props (rose petals and feathers) and consideration of the tones and colour palate in the set show attention to detail and complement the confidence of the appropriately casted performer to create a strong image and the re-enforce brand identity across the campaign. Lip-synching is consistently in time to present a convincing performance, and this is clearly recognisable and convincing as a music video. The editing is cut to the beat to good effect, sometimes to the beat and uses fades and effects to match the mood of the track and uses the repetition of the falling feathers to mark the structural changes. There is a sense of polish and purpose here along with creative confidence behind a simple idea, realised skilfully. Overall the video is well shot, mostly excellent in its editing and creates meaning with selection of footage and the theme of romance/couples in the city. excellent  mid level 4 35/40

Website Level 4

This is a detailed and more successful product, which functions purposefully in it aims and demonstrates attention to detail beyond the expectations of a home page. There is clear understanding of brand identity and consistency through colours, images, motifs and fonts with the other forms. The students have added a magazine cover for a (suitable?) publication, tour dates, social media, merchandise and a fake iTunes page linked to the website, making synoptic connections in the spirit of the specification. Highly proficient 8/10

Digipack Level 3 lower

Cover conforms to the conventions of digipacks, with central image maintaining the marketing strategy of the video focusing on the singer. There is consistency with the other 2 products in use of branding through colours, fonts and design. The image of the artist is clearly established and re-enforces the music video. There is attention to detail with the institutional blurb and record label. Overall some variety in the images which are far stronger in their composition, arrangement and editing than the text overlays and sizing which rather lets this down. All the conventional elements are present with the dimensions, tracklistings, spine and thanks message inside. Proficient 7/10

Evaluation Level 2 Basic 10/20
The responses generally do not include the detailed presentation of examples to match the analysis of the productions. Whilst question 1 is edited to the commentary, the same standard does not apply to the other 3. Further detail in how audience feedback was practically used to improve and an assessment of the success of the campaign would be required for higher marks. 

Tapz and Tierney

Music Video Level 4

Attention to detail in the opening with beat editing and well framed and composed photographs and footage, this is convincing as a low budget UK hip hop artist. Shots of various locations around London create a strong identity along with a appropriate and confident performer, Although some of the performances become repetitive, there is some movement and pace to the video that maintains interest creative decisions to hold the longer shots and justified and intended to create a stronger sense of reality, Costume changes and escalating ‘value’ of the locations have subtle subtext to the narrative/theme of the video which fit in with the lyrics of the track. Some standout footage with control over lighting as with hyper-editing to the drum fills and cut & ghosted samples reflected in the visuals. A minimalist, clever and confident piece Level 4 mid 36/40

Website 10/10

The website home page has been interpreted to all formats of desktop, as an app and mobile page to update the brief and demonstrate synoptic links to AS as in the spirit of the spec.  There is a strong sense of design and layout, with consideration and consistency across the campaign in fonts, image and costume to create a modern, classy whilst urban hip hop image rather that the conventional gangster. Links to tours and appropriate venues, a bio yet no advertising for the digipack? Separate photoshoot was conducted with lighting and locations. A confident and convincing approaching professional practice. Low L3 7/10

Digipack 0/10
The group did not submit a digipack for assessment

Evaluation 0/20
The group did not submit an evaluation


Emily, Ben and Ellie


Digipack Level 2 higher
The digipack is recognisable by its form and is a product of a group of 3. There is some consistency in the use of font, and there is some sense of continuity across the panels. There is some attention to detail in the application of institutional logos and legal blurb. This has been place on the left cover however rather than the back. The design is rather basic (‘little love’ positioning on the cover) and bears little relationship with the video other than the use of the star, who does not appear to have been branded thoughtfully. There is some skill in the use of layering and blending. Level 2, basic approaching competence.
UPDATE Improvements made 19/3/15 now Level 3 Proficient 7/10

Website L1/Lowest L2

Other than the font used in the banner, the website lacks any consistency of style, colour or theme with the digipack and music video, and demonstrates a lack of understanding of the image of their artist and purpose in how to brand them. It is unclear what genre this is intended to belong to. The circles are really quite inappropriate both in design and text, and show a lack of care/research with the inclusion of soundcloud on the home page and the music video is not housed here as part of the campaign. As the work of 3 students, this is very basic and lacks care or comparitive reference to existing examples. Lowest level 2, very basic.
UPDATE Improvements made 19/3/15 now Level 2 Mid Basic 5/10

Video Level 2 Basic upper border 23/40

Despite the edit demonstrating notable synching issues at the start, there are individual shots that demonstrate some skill in composition and thoughtfulness in the framing and the synching at the end is tighter. The stop motion opening sequence and the ‘ghosting’ shows creativity but is not used consistently to provide interest or meaning. Generally the shots are held too long for the pace of the track (20 secs plus) and show basic interpretation of the synaesthesia of the track or structure of the song. There is an attempt to use costume and location, though both lack depth to provide suitable contrast and therefore meaning - the absence of lighting impacts here also. There is little narrative progression/resolution to the images on screen. As the product of a group of 3 this is best fit in the upper basic level, justified with the inclusion of found images of women to fill in the time.

Evaluation



Hayley & Jen

Music Video Level 4 mid-upper

A strong sense of control and creative intention through the use of camera and editing to realise this narrative performance video, which is well paced despite being nearly 4 minutes and offeres memorable moments. There is attention to detail in the mise-en-scene with costume and location changes (including a hedge maze), supported with a confident central performance casted appropritely to the image of the artist, and additional props to provoke interest such as the sparklers, the shrine and the feather/angel character. The framing and composition of shots is generally excellent, with a variety of angle and positions employed to create meaning and hold interest, close-ups dominate and keeping focus on the artist/character. A purposeful and consistent use of the colour palate through colour correction visualised the mood and atmosphere of the song. Lip synching when used judicuously is convincing and well performed. Most shots are steady and movement is controlled and smooth - the doors opening at the start demonstrate confidence and the final 90 degree arc into the sunlight. Excellent across most of the skills consistently. Level 4 37/40

Digpack

Establishes a strong brand identity and maintains consistency of image across the other products in colour, font, design, focus on the artist and the vintage look. There is attention to details with the barcode and record label and this has a clear sense of purpose and skill in design, using images shot from a standalone photoshoot. Although some detail missing, there is enough to be considered excellent in most skills. Level 4 9/10

Website

The website serves its function in drawing together the campaign, embedding the music video and digipack. This demonstrates a strong sense of design and arrangement of images, social networks and multimedia content. The digipack release is central and promoted through iTunes along with tour dates, soundcloud tracks and merchandising drawing on synoptic understanding as in the spirit of the specification. Level 4 9/10

Evaluation
The group have submitted 3/4 completed responses
Level 2 upper (basic)


Sophie & Sophie

Music Video Level 4 mid
http://www.sophiebishopandsophiegordona2blog.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/the-archtypes-steady-heart-music-video.html
A confident and mostly well-shot video, which works well with the chosen track to visualise the mood. There are some memorable shots that are interesting such as the use of green screen to tie in the train/falling on the tracks druken hallucination with the scenes at the house at the resolution showing creative intentions and a degree of flair in storytelling. The flowers kicked into the camera to cut to black, and the use of objects thrown that are (sometimes) edited to the break or section changes in the song. There is great variety in the range of camera positions, angles and perpective used and there are strong moments of composition to create claustrophobia . There is some attention to detail here in the choice of a run down location to reflect the mental state. Some jump cuts are always not framed carefully enough to make the effect work seamlessly and the pacing of the edit is not always matched to the pace of the track but the central performance is confident, the casting decisions are subvert expectations of target audience and family relationships. Overall excellent in most of the skills, Lower Level 4 33/40

Website

The website accomplishes its function in uniting the campaign, advertising the release date and image of the digipack using a conventional banner – though they have uploaded the whole 4 page panel key. The colour palate and images are consistent across the campaign as are generally the fonts. There is understanding and construction of merchandising, online distribution, social networks, tour dates drawing on synoptic understanding as in the spirit of the spec. The home page is quite well designed with a sense of balance, though a little sparse and lacking polish in the composition. 
UPDATE Improvements made 19/3/15 now Level 3 Proficient Upper 8/10

Digipack

A strong sense of purpose and design here. The digipack maintains brand identity with the other products through its use of colour, font, theme and has some interesting composition to produce a striking front image (and the rainbow on the boat inside cover) that unites the image of ‘where the band are from’ approach to Indie genre. There is attention to detail with lyric quotes inside, well-framed images and track listing appropriate to an album. Barcode and record company logo and legal blurb are present though the latter is squeezed in at the bottom. Nevertheless, control, purpose and good use of original images with excellence in layout skills. Level 4 9/10

Evaluation


Natasha

Website 2/10
http://natashamediaa2lta.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/website.html
The website uses a central image that does not conform to the brand identity of the use of colours, images and theme of the other texts (though this is confusing since there are 2 drafts of the digipack and this matches one of them, though not the music video). The album itself is not promoted effectively with release date prominent on the home page or social networking, tours etc. Though Natasha has extended the brief into including merchandising. Overall this demonstrates borderline minimal and basic understanding of the role of a website within an album release campaign or the function of this in uniting all the elements.
Level 1


Digipack 7/10 (Level 3 low)

*Natasha hasn't labelled her final digipack, as the stronger of the 2 drafts I have chosen to mark the 1st.

The wood theme links with the video, as well as focusing on the central artist. The effect used however whilst an interesting visual statement does not necessarily unite the campaign as it is not used consistently, nor do the colours join those used in the video’s palate. Taken in isolation however, this is recognisable and an ‘Indie’ digipack, the orange on green colour scheme is not easy to read and fonts however on the track listing. Some attention to detail with the legal blurb at the bottom, spine and barcode.  Whilst the effects and photography demonstrate confidence in skills, this is undermined by the lack of polish on the track listings and title (which is easily missed).

Music Video Low Level 3

Some interesting ideas in this conceptual/narrative video – a variety of footage and shot types, with underused/unexplained content (baths, masked characters in black, the paint) giving a loose sense of narrative that creates mystery and ambiguity but the lack of resolution and premature ending make this look unfinished and uncontrolled. A strong central character throughout gives a confident performance let down quite heavily by the out of time/unconfident lip synching, and a lack control over lighting to produce the desired mood on the performance sections. There is some attention to detail here in the use of make-up, the interesting use of paint follow the leaves, the hospital external and the costume of the medical smock and masks to create meaning. Overall, the editing of footage does not match the pace required by the beat of the song but tries to visualise the structure of the track (the ‘eye’ close up at the end of the section), if not the changes in pace and mood. Incongruity of narrative progression suggests an ambitious idea unrealised. Some nice individual moments however best fit Level 3 lower 27/40

Evaluation 2/20
The evaluation is incomplete with 3/4 questions responded to all using the Prezi form. The audience bullet points critical feedback, but the response lacks the evidence of who the audience was, at what stage the feedback fwas collected or how it was used to improve the work. The success of the work is not objective. The campaign response again is bullets points without the discussion of creative decisions required to demonstrate understanding re-enforced by the absence of examples. There is no discussion of use of conventions beyond a brief examination/categorisation of a Radiohead example looked at in class.
Level 1


 

Friday, 16 January 2015

COVER WORK today 300 word write up email to me please

New Info: Jameson & Cultural Recycling (stylistic approach)
"in a world in which stylistic innovation is no longer possible, all that is leftis to imitate dead styles” Jameson


Create Meaning: Mind Map the Intertextual references from the film
Q. How does your familiarity with and immersion with the characters change how you read the text - how does Nostalgia makes it's meaning richer? 

To what extent is Wreck It Ralph a 'Post'-Modern text? 
Collect examples from the clips

Discuss how it demonstrates the following to create something new and create Nostalgia 
  1. PARODY &/or PASTICHE
  2. BRICOLAGE  
    INTERTEXTUALITY (TRON?)
    HYBRIDITY   
  3. NOSTALGIA & RETRO  
  4. PLAYFUL & IRONIC (Self Reflexive)

 
1. Analyse the film for examples of Cultural Recycling (Intertextuality, Bricolage) - how is it making something out of existing texts and how does it create Nostalgia/Retro?
Create Meaning





Homework: MID MODULE ASSESSMENT TASK: MICRO ESSAY 2: 300 WORDS

Tuesday, 16 December 2014

CHRISTMAS WORK EXAM PREP

Starter - why are these relevant to our study?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YERtfFpLIsU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3efV2wqEjEY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lusyrxzOtDU


Recap: http://leighmediaa212pomo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/how-tv-ruined-your-life-progress.html

Assessment: http://leighmediaa212pomo.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/42-what-was-pomo-again-revision-homework.html



Watch and analyse Wreck It Ralph (case study one)
Initial thoughts - http://leighmediaa212pomo.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/theorists-street-signs.html

1. Why does it LOOK Pomo? (Jameson)
2. Does it THINK Pomo? (Baudrillard)
3. Is it AFTER modernism (what structures and boundaries - Lyotard)

Task 1.
Pick up where we left off.
Apply each of the TERMINOLOGY words to Wreck It Ralph - screen captures please.

http://leighmediaa212pomo.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/week-2-so-what-is-post-modernism-again.html

Task 2.
Fill in the grid to EXPLAIN why these TERMS are Pomo (how they break boundaries)

Homework:

Task 3. PRE-READING/THINKING FOR 1st CLASS
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON LINKING JAMESONS STYLISTIC POMO ASPECTS TO NOSTALGIA.

http://leighmediaa212pomo.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/lesson-43-case-study-1-wreck-it-ralph.html


Session 2:
Apply to demonstrate:
Close analysis of scenes from Wreck It Ralph:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B6hk0WVDZfsiODdyOWtDYi1vRzg&usp=sharing

Using your grids from last week, analyse using Lyotard's Critical Appraoch
1. Breaks or collapses structures between:
  1. Human & Technology
  2. Real and Artificial
  3. Good and Evil
  4. Male and Female
  5. Genres

Q: Are there any Modernism aspects that make Ralph still Modernist?

2. Demonstrates a Lack of Belief in Progress or Rejection of Grand Narratives   
  1. Morality (Good beats evil, self sacrifice etc) - it is a Disney film...
  2. Dystopia
  3. Positive Resolution
  4. Democracy
  5. Intertextual references

3. Demonstrates emptiness of superficial

Simulacra and Hyper-reality (celebrates the artifical)
Intertextual references
Style over substance (VFX over story)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6hk0WVDZfsiaEp5WllnZ1pteVU/view?usp=sharing




Q: To what extent is Ralph a Post Modern media text?
In what ways it is most pomo?

New Info: Jameson & Cultural Recycling (stylistic approach)


"in a world in which stylistic innovation is no longer possible, all that is leftis to imitate dead styles” Jameson


Create Meaning: Mind Map the Intertextual references from the film
Q. How does your familiarity with and immersion with the characters change how you read the text - how does Nostalgia makes it's meaning richer? 

To what extent is Wreck It Ralph a 'Post'-Modern text? 
Collect examples from the clips

Discuss how it demonstrates the following to create something new and create Nostalgia 
  1. PARODY &/or PASTICHE
  2. BRICOLAGE  
    INTERTEXTUALITY (TRON?)
    HYBRIDITY   
  3. NOSTALGIA & RETRO  
  4. PLAYFUL & IRONIC (Self Reflexive)

 
Feedback on Liniot



1. Analyse the film for examples of Cultural Recycling (Intertextuality, Bricolage) - how is it making something out of existing texts and how does it create Nostalgia/Retro?
Create Meaning




Homework: MID MODULE ASSESSMENT TASK: MICRO ESSAY 2: 300 WORDS

Monday, 15 December 2014

Notice to Moderator: Final R&P Marks G325 2015

Dear Moderator

As you can see from the previous posts, the deadline set for the Research and Planning has now expired and all students have now begun their Construction stage (see previous post to check deadlines set and published and individual group blogs for documentation of shooting, editing etc). As all group are now producing, the following are the Research and Planning grades awarded by the centre for 2015.

Sophie B & Sophie G: Top Level 4 20/20 (A)
Both quality and quantity are excellent. Thorough, purposeful and regular posting. Well presented and most posts have some commentary showing understanding. Research goes beyond complete and excellent using interaction with professional processes using social networks (such as casting and interaction with the actual target audience) with regular drafting, experimentation with the shots and styles, and documents the process clearly. Both students have evidenced their contributions to an excellent standard.

Natasha B-H: Top Level 4 20/20 (A)
An impressive quantity of work from 1 student working alone with an excellent level of care and quality of information. Regular drafting, commentary and presentation of shots and styles and experimentation with test footage, this blog documents the process clearly. Interaction with professional processes using social networks (such as casting and interaction with the actual target audience) and interviews with the client. An excellent level of care with a range of media utilitised in the presentation, this approaches professional standards.

Ben H, Emily H & Ellie: Lower Level 4: 16/20 (A)
As a group of 3 there are clearly greater expectations of quality and quantity of research, planning and ideas as well as the time to have care and detail in the digital presentation. All research is purposeful with a strong sense of understanding the purpose of the brief and a considerable amount of research and examples looked at. The journey of the video and concept is well documented with where the idea has come from as well as stylistic influences. There is a range of pop female artists studied, though it is unclear how their brand identity has influenced the results and the digipack and website lack drafting. The production of the music video is well planned with experimentation with photoshop and cinematic techniques as well as some test footage. A target audience is identified relating to the actual client used and there is persuasive commentary on how the concept and mode of address will target assumptions about gender and age. All members contributed successfully towards the portfolio with a balance of quantity and quality.

Tierney K & Tapiwa M: Lower Level 2: 10/20 (E) Upper Level 2 (D)
Inconsistent and incomplete. There are some genuine strengths in the presentation of some posts, for example the commentary on target audience and the website/digipack analysis/ and experimentation which shows the derivitive ideas built on from the earlier directed class tasks. However overall, the research and the planning has not facilitated the process and the journey is unclear as to the development and influence of ideas. Many posts have no annotation and therefore no understanding. The planning reflects disjointed organisation and ineffective time management with no contingency planning. There is an incomplete storyboard and a supporting animatic. Tapiwa has clearly demonstrated a greater contribution to the portfolio as his voice is present on the analysis hence the differentiation in marks awarded.

Briony C & Morgan R: Highest L3 15/20 (B) /Mid Level 3 (C) respectively 13/20
While the process has been documented well, the research purposeful and there is a good quantity of planning, there is a lack of evidence of actual audience research or interaction/investigation or specific identification expected to satisfy excellent. The group have demonstrated some experimentation with the style and drafted the video with an animatic using found images - though there are no drafts of the digipack or website and the final design has been selected and it is not clear how they arrived at this idea. Briony's contribution evidenced by the amount of blog posts is more substantial than Morgan's hence the differentiation in grades.

Hayley B & Jen Robinson: Mid Level 4 17/20 (A) both
Thorough, purposeful and regular posting. A strong degree of care has been taken in the presentation with a variety of digital media forms used and most posts have some commentary showing understanding. Research is complete and has a confident level of excellence across the criteria using some interaction with professional processes via social networks with the client and identifies the actual target audience. There is drafting and experimentation with the shots and styles, and documents the process clearly - though there are no drafts of the ancillaries hence the placement within level 4. Both students have contributed sufficiently to be awarded parity in the grade.

Best wishes,

Rich Barton
Centre 61101 assessor &
OCR Moderator for G325 Advanced Production

Tuesday, 9 December 2014

Deadlines for coursework

Deadline for your Rough Cut Music Video, Rough Final Digipack & Rough a Final Website:
Friday 19th 5pm

Not the effects and tweaks - all filming will be completed, sequenced and synced and beat edited for 00:00-03:00 or 3:30

Uploaded and embedded to you blog

Each session you will present a video diary to the moderator updating your progress and what has/has not been achieved

Each session you will presents schedule of who is doing what this week, for instance Billy is the first 30 seconds etc...

----------
Deadline 2: 6th January
Over the Christmas break, Contact and send the link for your Rough Cut to your online target audience using a variety of forms of feedback:
Video conf and Skype
Screen captures of likes & comments
Survey monkey.com

-----------
Deadline 3: FINAL DEADLINE CONSTRUCTION Fri 9th January for your Final Cut Deadline

-----------
Deadline 4: FRIDAY 13th Feb Evaluation
Evaluations are in end of Module 1




Tuesday, 4 November 2014

2.1.1 Deadlines and Countdown

The List of Research Tasks and your final deadline date is October 17th. After this date I cannot assess your work as having excellent 'Time Management' and cannot place you in Level 4

Over Half Term you will be required to complete the following Plannng Tasks: Your deadline for this is 14th November. After this date I cannot assess your work as havig excellent 'Time Management' and cannot place you in Level 4


22. 2nd Test Shoot
23. Production Schedule
26. Test Shots Casting - using http://www.starnow.co.uk/
27. Auditions (video with commentary/skype/youtube etc)
28. Costume Designs
29. Risk Assessments
31. Back up site Recce
32. Rehearsals (videos)
33. Call Sheets 
34. Weather Check (if required) 

Deadline for Rough Cut is Friday 5th December 5pm (5 weeks)




Starter:  http://leighmediaa212.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/video-diary-production-diaries.html

New Info: consistency-in-design-exemplar-what grade?

Create Meaning: Research and Planning - Ancillaries
 Digipack analysis tasks: video commentary
Research: Video commentary or Image analysis using:
wallwisher
emaze

example of excellence:
http://littleduckling11.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/final-music-video.html
http://katekurtonmedia.blogspot.co.uk/

Apply to demonstrate:

Student 1:
1. Mood Board of your campaign digipack

2. Pencil design

3. drafts of your Digipack (for 4 or 6 panel with spine) or use found images put together in Photoshop
Colours
Style (blends, filters etc)
Track listing - Fonts (dafont choices)
Logo

Comment on how they integrate with your Campaign as a whole to create Brand Identity and Image

Student 2:
1. Website Map

2. Draft of your Website on Wix with:
Rough/found images
Banner
Logo and Graphic

Present to the class

Pre-learning for Thursday: Revise Narrative, Genre and Representation for exam prep next week.

Sunday, 12 October 2014

Level 4 Pitch Excellent A Grade & Your Deadlines for Production



The above is an excellent example of how you bring together all of your influences, mood boards, target audience research into 1 to back up your pitch and present it in an interesting creative way.

This is what you have to do to get Level 4 Excellent for your Pitch and your Test Footage

This demonstrates how this student has used the hours of independent study time to produce her grade A portfolio - on their own.

The List of Research Tasks and your final deadline date is October 17th. After this date I cannot assess your work as having excellent 'Time Management' and cannot place you in Level 4

Over Half Term you will be required to complete the following Plannng Tasks: Your deadline for this is 14th November. After this date I cannot assess your work as havig excellent 'Time Management' and cannot place you in Level 4